Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

PROCESSO DE PUBLICAÇÃO CIENTIFICA: Fontes utilizadas

Conteúdos que "inspiraram" este guia

Öchsner, A. 2013. "Publishing companies, publishing fees, and Open Access journals". Em Introduction to scientific publishing: Backgrounds, concepts, strategies, 23-29. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38646-6.

(Disponível na Biblioteca da FEUP)

Elsevier. 2015. "Understanding the Publishing Process: How to publish in scholarly journals". https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/resource-library/understanding-the-publishing-process-how-to-publish-in-scholarly-journals.

Mukherjee, D. 2018. "11 reasons why research papers are rejected". Typeset (blogue), 7 de março de 2018. https://blog.typeset.io/11-reasons-why-research-papers-are-rejected-3e272b633186.

Eassom, H. 2016. "6 tips for authors on surviving Peer Review". https://www.wiley.com/network/researchers/submission-and-navigating-peer-review/infographic-6-tips-for-authors-on-surviving-peer-review.

Elsevier. s.d. "What is Peer Review?". Acedido a 2 de novembro de 2020. https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/what-is-peer-review.

Mukherjee, D. 2018. "11 reasons why research papers are rejected". Typeset (blogue), 7 de março de 2018. https://blog.typeset.io/11-reasons-why-research-papers-are-rejected-3e272b633186.

PLOS. s.d. "Open Peer Review". Acedido a 2 de novembro de 2020. https://plos.org/resource/open-peer-review/.

Pöschl, U. 2010. "Interactive Open Access publishing and public Peer Review: The effectiveness of transparency and self-regulation in scientific quality assurance". IFLA Journal 36, no. 1 (março): 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035209359573.

Research Information Network CIC. 2015. "Scholarly Communication and Peer Review: The current landscape and future trends". https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/scholarly-communication-and-peer-review-mar15.pdf.

Ross-Hellauer, T. 2017. "What is Open Peer Review? A systematic review". F1000Research 6 (agosto). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.1.

Schmidt, B. e E. Gorogh. 2017. "New toolkits on the block: Peer Review alternatives in scholarly communication". Em Expanding perspectives on Open Science: Communities, cultures and diversity in concepts and practices: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing, editado por L. Chan e F. Loizides, 62-74. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-62.

Springer. s.d. "Common reasons for rejection". Acedido a 2 de novembro de 2020. https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/submitting-to-a-journal-and-peer-review/what-is-open-access/10285582.

Spyns, P. e M. E. Vidal. 2015. "The concept of “Peer Reviewing”". Scientific Peer Reviewing: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25084-7_1.

Ware, M. e M. Mabe. 2015. The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf.

Wiley. s.d. "The Peer Review process". Acedido a 2 de novembro de 2020. https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/the-peer-review-process.html.

Elsevier. 2015. "New feature: Microarticles". http://www.journals.elsevier.com/results-in-physics/news/new-feature-microarticles.

Fontanarosa, P. B. 2014. "Editorial matters: Guidelines for writing effective editorials". JAMA 311, no. 21: 2179-80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.6535.

Gilson, L. L. e W. D. Davis. 2020. "Writing a special issue editorial: Unique challenges to cooperative behavior". Group & Organization Management 45, no. 2 (abril): 139-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120914084.

Hayward, A. 2017. "5 Differences between a research paper and a review paper". https://www.editage.com/insights/5-differences-between-a-research-paper-and-a-review-paper?refer-type=infographics.

Öchsner, A. 2013. "Publishing in scientific journals". Em Introduction to scientific publishing: Backgrounds, concepts, strategies, 65-81. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38646-6. (Disponível na Biblioteca da FEUP)

Palmatier, R. W., M. B. Houston e J. Hulland. 2018. "Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure". Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 46, no. 1 (janeiro): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4.

Patriotta, G. 2020. "Writing impactful review articles". Journal of Management Studies 57, no. 6 (setembro): 1272-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12608.

Springer. 2016. "Types of journal manuscripts". https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/types-of-journal-manuscripts/1356.

American Journal Experts. s.d. "What are preprints, and how do they benefit authors?". Acedido a 6 de novembro de 2020. https://www.aje.com/arc/benefits-of-preprints-for-researchers/.

Elsevier. s.d. "Article sharing". Acedido a 6 de novembro de 2020. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing.

Hyun, M. H. e T. S. Seo. 2019. "The spread and the future of preprint servers that support the quick sharing of research results". International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 9, no. 4: 50-59. https://www.ijicc.net/index.php/ijicc-editions/2019/126-vol-9-iss-4.

Publons. 2018. "The what, why, and how of preprints and Peer Review". https://publons.com/blog/the-what-why-and-how-of-preprints-and-peer-review/.

Sherpa Romeo. s.d. "Glossary - Accepted Version". Acedido a 6 de novembro de 2020. https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/about.html.

Öchsner, A. 2013. "Ethical guidelines for publishing". Em Introduction to scientific publishing: Backgrounds, concepts, strategies, 83-87. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38646-6.

(Disponível na Biblioteca da FEUP)

Créditos

Ícones

Fases do processo - Ícones: Arrows collection, José Manuel de Laá, The Noun Project

Preprint - Ícone: Pencil Document, Graphik Designz, The Noun Project

Postprint - Ícone: paper sheet accept, Unlimicon, The Noun Project

Versão final do artigo - Ícone: article, arejoenah, The Noun Project

Publicar na U.Porto - Ícone: university location, SAM Designs, The Noun Project

Imagens

Fases do processo - Imagem: Clayton Robbins, 2020, Unsplash

Avaliação editorial - Imagem: Jan Tinneberg, 2018, Unsplash

Peer Review - Imagem: Christian Rucinski, 2020, Unsplash

Tipo de artigos - Imagem: Tolga Ulkan, 2020, Unsplash

Versões de um artigo - Imagem: Patrick Hendry, 2017, Unsplash

Fontes - Imagem: Studio Dekorasyon, 2015, Unsplash

Licença Creative Commons
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.
Podem estar disponíveis autorizações adicionais às concedidas no âmbito desta licença em http://biblioteca.fe.up.pt.